New Balance FuelCell SC Elite v5 v. Nike Alphafly 3
The wide-foot answer to the Alphafly: a broader platform, a 4mm drop, and £35 less.
The short answer
The Nike Alphafly 3 is 15g lighter (198g against 213g), the New Balance FuelCell SC Elite v5 is £35 cheaper at RRP (£250 against £285), and both hold their foam for roughly 250km of racing. Both are inside the World Athletics 40mm road limit.
Weight · men's US 9
FuelCell SC Elite v5213g
Alphafly 3198g
0320g
Price · UK RRP
FuelCell SC Elite v5£250
Alphafly 3£285
0£450
Competitive life · km before the foam fades
FuelCell SC Elite v5250km
Alphafly 3250km
0700km
■ marks the better figure, where better is not a matter of taste
Both soles, one drawing3 units per mm · the line is the 40mm road limit
FuelCell SC Elite v540mm — on the limit
Alphafly 340mm — on the limit
The tape
manufacturer-stated · ■ the better figure, where better is not a matter of taste
Still the reference marathon shoe. The Air pods give a propulsive forefoot that nothing else quite replicates, and the wider platform makes it manageable late in a race when your form has gone.
■ Caution Sits at exactly 40mm — legal, but with no margin. It is a lot of shoe for anyone racing slower than about 4:30/km, and the forefoot pods reward a genuine forefoot strike.